Latest News
 

ESCAPING THE POST-BOOM PITFALLS

September, 2005

Perth's buoyant real estate market over the past few years has created some potential pitfalls that, beyond the boom, are likely to catch out uneducated investors, according to buyer's agency Property Wizards.

Managing Director Liz Sterzel said that while the end of the boom was still a way off, by beginning to be more careful about what suburbs they invest in, buyers can ensure they pick up boom-proof investments that will perform even after the market slows.

"The main trap for buyers will be choosing areas that have performed well during the boom, but that are unlikely to continue to shine over the long term," she said.

She said the recent market hype had seen many previously long term low growth suburbs enjoy significant growth in what's been dubbed a "catch up."

Examples included suburbs like Calista, Westfield and Ferndale.

The median house price in those areas had grown at 4.9%, 4.7% and 5.8% a year respectively in the 15 years to June 2002.

In the past 5 years, each suburb experienced considerably higher growth - with house values in Calista growing at 15.1% a year, Westfield 13.6% and Ferndale 13.9%.

Ms Sterzel said in dollar terms, Calista had performed superbly over the boom period.

"Previously, Calista house prices took 15 years to double in value, but over the last 5 years they also doubled in value," she said.

"But that doesn't mean it will automatically deliver in the future.

"The key point for investors is, that some suburbs which have enjoyed similar success, will continue to deliver in the long term - but probably 4 out of 5 of them will not.

"That's because many areas grew in value solely because of the strength of the boom, in other words, there were virtually no valid factors driving growth, which makes them risky investments in a post-boom period."

Ms Sterzel said the difficulty for investors would be in looking "beyond the hype" of the boom to determine which of these "catch up" suburbs would cut it over the long term.

"It's not enough to say that a particular suburb has been a winner over the past year or two and will therefore power ahead in the future," she said.

"When the market softens only those with overriding reasons to continue growing, regardless of the property cycle, will be successes."

Ms Sterzel said there were several factors to consider when deciding if a suburb was a dud or a gem.

Factors suggesting growth may continue include:

  1. "Suburbs where infrastructure changes are in progress that will make the area more accessible. For example, the rail link to the southern coastal strip.

  2. Where developments will provide more facilities that will attract people to live in the area. For example, new and better shopping, or marinas such as in Mullaloo and Coogee. " Where there are proposed changes to zoning, allowing upgrades to development density. For example, parts of Gosnells. Factors suggesting growth may not continue include: " Suburbs that have grown in the boom, but do not have tangible, valid reasons to drive further growth. " Areas at risk of potential oversupply. For example, inner city units. " Outer-edged suburbs where large areas of land exist for development. "The key point essentially is that following the herd is not smart - research the opportunity and satisfy yourself that you are making a clever investment," said Ms Sterzel.


For more information, please contact
Mr Trevor Dunkley
Director
Property Wizards
trevor@propertywizards.com.au
Tel: (08) 9381 7450